Skip to content

Document API email-reply bot-comment behavior on replyConversation#551

Open
markdennis22 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
markdennis/document-api-email-reply-bot-comment-behavior
Open

Document API email-reply bot-comment behavior on replyConversation#551
markdennis22 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
markdennis/document-api-email-reply-bot-comment-behavior

Conversation

@markdennis22

@markdennis22 markdennis22 commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why?

https://app.intercom.com/a/inbox/tx2p130c/inbox/team/5826718/conversation/215474495894253?view=List

Customers using POST /conversations/{conversation_id}/reply to reply to a conversation that originated from an inbound customer email expect the reply to send an outbound email and to eventually produce a seen receipt. That's not what happens: by default the reply is recorded as an unnotifiable bot comment — no email goes out, and no seen receipt is ever generated. Outbound email replies from bots or Operator via the API are gated by a workspace setting.

The previous one-line operation description didn't capture any of this, which has been causing confusion in customer reports.

How?

Extended the replyConversation operation description in both the v2.15 and Preview specs with a warning admonition that calls out the default behavior, the absence of a seen receipt, and how to enable outbound email replies.

Generated with Claude Code

Replies posted via POST /conversations/{id}/reply to a conversation that
originated from an inbound customer email are recorded as unnotifiable bot
comments by default — no outbound email is sent and no `seen` receipt is
generated unless the workspace has email-reply-via-API enabled. This was
not obvious from the previous one-line operation description and has been
causing confusion for customers.

Adds a warning admonition to the replyConversation description in both the
v2.15 and Preview specs.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant