Skip to content

update docs for Guardrails proxy support OD-127#2688

Merged
nedaKaighobadi merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
guardrails-proxy
Jun 19, 2026
Merged

update docs for Guardrails proxy support OD-127#2688
nedaKaighobadi merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
guardrails-proxy

Conversation

@nedaKaighobadi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👀 Live preview

🚧 To do

  • If relevant, include the Jira issue key at the end of the pull request title
  • Perform a self-review of the changes
  • Fix any issues reported by the CI/CD

@nedaKaighobadi nedaKaighobadi requested a review from a team as a code owner June 19, 2026 12:06
@github-actions github-actions Bot temporarily deployed to Netlify June 19, 2026 12:06 Inactive
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Overall readability score: 54.23 (🟢 +0)

File Readability
codacy-guardrails-getting-started.md 59.44 (🟢 +0.72)
View detailed metrics

🟢 - Shows an increase in readability
🔴 - Shows a decrease in readability

File Readability FRE GF ARI CLI DCRS
codacy-guardrails-getting-started.md 59.44 48.64 11.41 13.2 10.62 6.71
  🟢 +0.72 🟢 +0.41 🟢 +0.19 🟢 +0.2 🟢 +0 🟢 +0.01

Averages:

  Readability FRE GF ARI CLI DCRS
Average 54.23 43.17 10.9 12.3 12.24 8.01
  🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0
View metric targets
Metric Range Ideal score
Flesch Reading Ease 100 (very easy read) to 0 (extremely difficult read) 60
Gunning Fog 6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read) 8 or less
Auto. Read. Index 6 (very easy read) to 14 (extremely difficult read) 8 or less
Coleman Liau Index 6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read) 8 or less
Dale-Chall Readability 4.9 (very easy read) to 9.9 (extremely difficult read) 6.9 or less

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a new section to the documentation detailing proxy configuration and custom CA certificate path settings for Codacy Guardrails. The review feedback suggests minor text improvements, including using the standard 'VS Code' spelling instead of 'VSCode' for branding consistency, and capitalizing 'Ca' to 'CA' for correct technical terminology.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

Comment thread docs/codacy-guardrails/codacy-guardrails-getting-started.md
Comment thread docs/codacy-guardrails/codacy-guardrails-getting-started.md Outdated
@codacy-production

codacy-production Bot commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

Run reviewer

TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@codacy-production codacy-production Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

The PR correctly implements documentation for Codacy Guardrails proxy support and custom CA certificate configurations within the VSCode extension. Codacy results show the changes are up to standards with no new issues or complexity concerns.

While the implementation meets the acceptance criteria, the PR description is currently empty, providing no context for the changes. One minor consistency suggestion regarding technical acronyms was identified in the documentation text.

About this PR

  • The PR description is empty and contains only the default template instructions, providing no context for the change or links to related tasks/issues.

TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback

Comment thread docs/codacy-guardrails/codacy-guardrails-getting-started.md Outdated
@nedaKaighobadi nedaKaighobadi changed the title update docs for Guardrails proxy support update docs for Guardrails proxy support OD-127 Jun 19, 2026
@nedaKaighobadi nedaKaighobadi requested a review from a team June 19, 2026 12:59
@nedaKaighobadi nedaKaighobadi merged commit e197922 into master Jun 19, 2026
5 checks passed
@nedaKaighobadi nedaKaighobadi deleted the guardrails-proxy branch June 19, 2026 13:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants