Stronger precondition in pRHL tactics eager-seq and eager-while#1059
Draft
loutr wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Stronger precondition in pRHL tactics eager-seq and eager-while#1059loutr wants to merge 1 commit into
eager-seq and eager-while#1059loutr wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR provides a stronger precondition to one of the premises of the
eager seqpRHL tactic. Concretely, premise (c)'s precondition is strengthened fromto
A similar adjustment is derived for the
eager whiletactic (its soundness proof is based oneager seq).Some utility functions to manipulate and existentially generalise
ss_invandts_invstructs are added. These utility functions are not all used in this PR but are added for symmetry with similar universally-generalising utility functions.The purpose of this strengthening is to allow invariants (notably in the
eager whiletactic) to carry more information than equalities; which were otherwise limited by the fact that one had to provec' ~ c' : Eq ==> I.